Good save Mr P Frank

Cultural hybridity is central to globalisation, where human agents self-consciously and creatively combine local with global cultural formations in a bid to subvert potentially homogenizing forces associated with cultural imperialism (Cited in Schaefer & Karanp 2010 p. 309)

A variety of cultures have been representing in the world of film and fashion over many years. Many of these cultures, sadly, have been misinterpreted and misrepresented. Their sacred traditions taken out of context for our entertainment or for us to wear as costumes at parties. This is known as a form of ‘Cultural appropriation’ “when you take something from a culture that you don’t belong to…and use it outside of that cultural context, usually without understanding its cultural significance, and oftentimes changing its original meaning.” (WATANABE 2014)

So is it still acceptable to continue to dress in costumes that represent the stereotype associated with many cultures? The answer is a resounding no. Even in the UK, a country that has very little association with the Native American culture, organisers of the Glastonbury Festival decided to ban the sale of the Coachella (the Native American headdress) after an online petition was created in protest against the use of the headdress by those that attended the festival. With many finding it to be “offensive” to use something that is so sacred as a costume or cheap trinket sold for profits without acknowledging its history.

Unfortunately the problem lies within popular culture “when the majority of Americans see images of the Victoria’s Secret model, that may be the closest to Native culture they ever get.” (Beck 2013  p. 1). Or when they see their favourite popstar Katy Perry or Gwen Stefani strutting around on stage or in their film clips donning various different costumes that represents multiple cultural stereotypes. Even Pharrell Williams and Harry Styles have been caught out when they chose to wear Native American Headdress when they posed for photos.

However their has been positive movement in how some companies are choosing to react when under pressure by the public to change their attitudes towards the use of these sacred items so blatantly in their fashion lines. In 2012 the Paul Frank clothing line decided to utilise the Native American feather head dress placed atop the head of their logo Julia’s the Monkey. They created neon ‘Dream Catchin’ event where employees wore neon war paint, wore traditional head dress,carried bows or tomahawks and served up cocktails with stereotypical Native American names in celebration of fashion week. Unfortunately, while the night drew a crowd it also drew a plethora of criticism for it’s blatant disregard for the Native American traditions and culture. But instead of ignoring the backlash, or defending their actions, Paul Frank took on his critics, apologizing and agreeing that they had taken things a tad too far. They then did something wonderful, they asked a few Native American designers and a few of those that had criticised the  and created a whole new line. But this time they made sure to represent the culture in a more truthful way with less of the stereotypes. Instead of appropriating the culture they exchanged their understanding of their cultures and the result was a beautiful new line of clothing and accessories that represented the Native American culture beautifully. After a year the new line was released and Pail Frankn showed that it pays to learn a little about the history and stories rather than continue to perpetuate the stereotype.

Beck A 2013, Miss Appropriation: Why Do We Keep Talking About Her?, Tapestries: Interwoven voices of local and global identities, Beck Macalester College, Issue 1, Article 2.

Karan, K and Schaefer, DJ (2010) ‘Problematizing Chindia: Hybridity and Bollywoodization of popular Indian cinema in global film flows’, Global Media and Communication, 6: 3, pp. 309-316.://

marinashutup 2014, What Is Cultural Appropriation? Feminist Fridays, Online video December 5, Viewed 2 Sepember 2015,

Moore B 2013, Los Angeles Times Fashion Critic, Paul Frank Native American-designed collection an apology for powwow party?, post June 19, viewed September 2 2015,


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s